<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unbreakable Habits: The Lonely God is a Jerk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/2008/07/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/</link>
	<description>From Modern Mythcraft to Magical Surrealism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-13649</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-13649</guid>
		<description>Oh gosh, I&#039;m reading this so late, but I agree with ALL of this. This is one of the reasons why I never warmed to the show. Alot of my friends are like &quot;Isn&#039;t he DREAMY?&quot; and I would go &quot;BAH! HE&#039;S A BIG JERK!&quot;

I&#039;m glad other people agree! 

Also, I feel like all these seemingly arbitrary moments of jerkdom could be explained by the fact that he&#039;s a Time LORD, emphasis on the Lord. Like the Judeo-Christian God, he&#039;s full of mysterious, seemingly unfair ways and plans for everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gosh, I&#8217;m reading this so late, but I agree with ALL of this. This is one of the reasons why I never warmed to the show. Alot of my friends are like &#8220;Isn&#8217;t he DREAMY?&#8221; and I would go &#8220;BAH! HE&#8217;S A BIG JERK!&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad other people agree! </p>
<p>Also, I feel like all these seemingly arbitrary moments of jerkdom could be explained by the fact that he&#8217;s a Time LORD, emphasis on the Lord. Like the Judeo-Christian God, he&#8217;s full of mysterious, seemingly unfair ways and plans for everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigtog</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-10251</link>
		<dc:creator>tigtog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-10251</guid>
		<description>Why do you think that &quot;power-hungry&quot; is in some way diagnostic of sociopathy?  It&#039;s not even diagnostic of psychopathy in general, let alone sociopathy specifically. (There may be some common (but not universal) control-freak tendencies but they often operate at the micro-social level rather than the macro.)

You do know that there are many sociopaths out there who don&#039;t know that they are sociopaths, right?  They&#039;re not power-hungry in any socially unacceptable way, they do &quot;right&quot; by the lights of their community and culture because they grok the manifold benefits of social approval, and that being an outlaw involves discomfort and risk.  Simple risk/benefit analysis means they stay within social bounds.

Sociopaths just don&#039;t find empathy and compassion compelling motivators in the same way as more neurotypical people. Unless they move outside the bounds of acceptably competitive behaviour they will never come to a psychologist&#039;s attention to be analysed and written up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think that &#8220;power-hungry&#8221; is in some way diagnostic of sociopathy?  It&#8217;s not even diagnostic of psychopathy in general, let alone sociopathy specifically. (There may be some common (but not universal) control-freak tendencies but they often operate at the micro-social level rather than the macro.)</p>
<p>You do know that there are many sociopaths out there who don&#8217;t know that they are sociopaths, right?  They&#8217;re not power-hungry in any socially unacceptable way, they do &#8220;right&#8221; by the lights of their community and culture because they grok the manifold benefits of social approval, and that being an outlaw involves discomfort and risk.  Simple risk/benefit analysis means they stay within social bounds.</p>
<p>Sociopaths just don&#8217;t find empathy and compassion compelling motivators in the same way as more neurotypical people. Unless they move outside the bounds of acceptably competitive behaviour they will never come to a psychologist&#8217;s attention to be analysed and written up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>Do a lot of sociopaths spend their lives saving everyone else, again and again?  Come on.  Even by the definition given above, the Doctor is not a sociopath.  He&#039;s not power-hungry -- he has power, but he in no way wants to accumulate more.  The power he has seems to be more than he wants.  And he certainly has ethics, which he consistently displays by his efforts to come to peaceful resolutions avoiding loss of life and inspiring others to stand up and fight, to be heroes in their own right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a lot of sociopaths spend their lives saving everyone else, again and again?  Come on.  Even by the definition given above, the Doctor is not a sociopath.  He&#8217;s not power-hungry &#8212; he has power, but he in no way wants to accumulate more.  The power he has seems to be more than he wants.  And he certainly has ethics, which he consistently displays by his efforts to come to peaceful resolutions avoiding loss of life and inspiring others to stand up and fight, to be heroes in their own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jessup</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2824</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2824</guid>
		<description>Evie- 
I just pull my information from the official British Doctor Who magazine re: the doctor&#039;s granddaughter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evie-<br />
I just pull my information from the official British Doctor Who magazine re: the doctor&#8217;s granddaughter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evie</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>Evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>I forgot to say though, I agree with you on the doctor being a sociopath.  There are times when he certainly looks like he might be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to say though, I agree with you on the doctor being a sociopath.  There are times when he certainly looks like he might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evie</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>While there are a lot of theories as to whether Susan was a Time Lady unrelated to the Doctor but adopted by him or whether she was in fact not a Time Lord at all there isn&#039;t yet anything contradicting Susan and the Doctor&#039;s statements that he is her grandfather.  The theories on her being unrelated to the Doctor began in the 90s and not by people involved in the making of the television series.  There have been Doctor Who novels and a radio play that have her as unrelated to the Doctor, but the novels aren&#039;t cannon and sometimes contradict the direction the television series takes the Doctor.  Other Doctor Who novels chose to keep her as the Doctor&#039;s grandaughter.  Every time she has been seen in the television series she has been presented as his grandaughter.  The BBC&#039;s official Doctor Who website, under the classic series section, describes her as his grandaughter too.  Just like the Doctor very little history is given on her life or family previous to start of the series and perhaps at some point a future writer may decide to introduce information into the series saying that she was actually adopted.

Whether she was adopted or not, she was raised by the Doctor so it still seems cold to abandon her.  Also, at the time that they wrote that episode the writers saw her as his actual grandaughter, so intended to write the Doctor as the kind of person who would leave his daughter stranded because he thought it was for her own good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there are a lot of theories as to whether Susan was a Time Lady unrelated to the Doctor but adopted by him or whether she was in fact not a Time Lord at all there isn&#8217;t yet anything contradicting Susan and the Doctor&#8217;s statements that he is her grandfather.  The theories on her being unrelated to the Doctor began in the 90s and not by people involved in the making of the television series.  There have been Doctor Who novels and a radio play that have her as unrelated to the Doctor, but the novels aren&#8217;t cannon and sometimes contradict the direction the television series takes the Doctor.  Other Doctor Who novels chose to keep her as the Doctor&#8217;s grandaughter.  Every time she has been seen in the television series she has been presented as his grandaughter.  The BBC&#8217;s official Doctor Who website, under the classic series section, describes her as his grandaughter too.  Just like the Doctor very little history is given on her life or family previous to start of the series and perhaps at some point a future writer may decide to introduce information into the series saying that she was actually adopted.</p>
<p>Whether she was adopted or not, she was raised by the Doctor so it still seems cold to abandon her.  Also, at the time that they wrote that episode the writers saw her as his actual grandaughter, so intended to write the Doctor as the kind of person who would leave his daughter stranded because he thought it was for her own good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jessup</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>Sociopath is what I meant to say. He exhibits all the classic signs- charismatic, influential, power hungry, socially lovable, uses people for his own ends, has no concept of ethics (oh, that whole genocide thing isn&#039;t really an ethical thing- he committed genocide on two races, the Time Lords and the Daleks during the time war, and now he doesn&#039;t like genocide because he&#039;s LONELY.  Like most sociopaths, it all goes back to him)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sociopath is what I meant to say. He exhibits all the classic signs- charismatic, influential, power hungry, socially lovable, uses people for his own ends, has no concept of ethics (oh, that whole genocide thing isn&#8217;t really an ethical thing- he committed genocide on two races, the Time Lords and the Daleks during the time war, and now he doesn&#8217;t like genocide because he&#8217;s LONELY.  Like most sociopaths, it all goes back to him)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jessup</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jessup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>&quot;The first doctor locked his own grandaughter out of the tardis and left without her when she developed feelings for someone. &quot;

She wasn&#039;t actually his granddaughter though- she was a follow timelord who was disguised as his granddaughter while they were on earth. 

You know, I&#039;m starting to think the Doctor is a Social Path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first doctor locked his own grandaughter out of the tardis and left without her when she developed feelings for someone. &#8221;</p>
<p>She wasn&#8217;t actually his granddaughter though- she was a follow timelord who was disguised as his granddaughter while they were on earth. </p>
<p>You know, I&#8217;m starting to think the Doctor is a Social Path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evie</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your annalysis of the doctor, and I think that it has always been true of him, not just true of the recent doctors.  The classic doctors were always a combination of the negative and positive aspects.  He could be selfless in the way he faces danger to save people he barely knows, but he could just as easily be selfish and manipulative.  The first doctor locked his own grandaughter out of the tardis and left without her when she developed feelings for someone.  She was fairly young to be cut off from her only family to be with a guy she had met recently and she had also chosen to go back into the tardis rather than stay.  He decided what was best for her and put it into practice without a moments thought for what she would choose to do herself.  

I liked the way they re-introduced the 10th doctor to Jack at the end of the third series.  The way Jack confronted him made the viewer stop and think about the doctors actions and attitudes.  The doctor admitted to Jack that he abandoned him knowing full well he was alive and alone.  The way that he always disables Jack&#039;s time travel device reminds me of the way that the Time Lords stranded the third doctor on Earth.  At that point the doctor&#039;s tardis no longer worked and so he had to stay on Earth and help out with the various problems that Unit had to deal with.  At that point he couldn&#039;t just walk away at the end of each adventure without having to deal with the aftermath.  However, here we can see how selfish he can be.  He is constantly trying to fix the tardis and whenever he thinks it is about to work he tries to leave in it, despite the fact that it might be still in the middle of an adventure and the Earth is still in danger.

I personally really like the 10th doctor.  I love the way the writers portray him, I love the greatness and the huge flaws.  Although I was a little wary of Donna as a companion at first I rather like the way she constantly highlighted these flaws and made him face up to them.  I enjoyed a companion who stood up to him rather than worshipping him with the doe eyed look that the last two had.  I liked Rose and Martha a lot, but I loved the dynamic of a companion who doesn&#039;t let the doctor get away with anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your annalysis of the doctor, and I think that it has always been true of him, not just true of the recent doctors.  The classic doctors were always a combination of the negative and positive aspects.  He could be selfless in the way he faces danger to save people he barely knows, but he could just as easily be selfish and manipulative.  The first doctor locked his own grandaughter out of the tardis and left without her when she developed feelings for someone.  She was fairly young to be cut off from her only family to be with a guy she had met recently and she had also chosen to go back into the tardis rather than stay.  He decided what was best for her and put it into practice without a moments thought for what she would choose to do herself.  </p>
<p>I liked the way they re-introduced the 10th doctor to Jack at the end of the third series.  The way Jack confronted him made the viewer stop and think about the doctors actions and attitudes.  The doctor admitted to Jack that he abandoned him knowing full well he was alive and alone.  The way that he always disables Jack&#8217;s time travel device reminds me of the way that the Time Lords stranded the third doctor on Earth.  At that point the doctor&#8217;s tardis no longer worked and so he had to stay on Earth and help out with the various problems that Unit had to deal with.  At that point he couldn&#8217;t just walk away at the end of each adventure without having to deal with the aftermath.  However, here we can see how selfish he can be.  He is constantly trying to fix the tardis and whenever he thinks it is about to work he tries to leave in it, despite the fact that it might be still in the middle of an adventure and the Earth is still in danger.</p>
<p>I personally really like the 10th doctor.  I love the way the writers portray him, I love the greatness and the huge flaws.  Although I was a little wary of Donna as a companion at first I rather like the way she constantly highlighted these flaws and made him face up to them.  I enjoyed a companion who stood up to him rather than worshipping him with the doe eyed look that the last two had.  I liked Rose and Martha a lot, but I loved the dynamic of a companion who doesn&#8217;t let the doctor get away with anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempest</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/columns/unbreakable-habits-the-lonely-god-is-a-jerk/comment-page-1/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=721#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>So is he goig to take away time travel devices from everyone in the time agency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is he goig to take away time travel devices from everyone in the time agency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

