<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around the Blogosphere:  Worldcon Reports, Death of Print SF, Author Religions and Racism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/2008/08/around-the-blogosphere-worldcon-reports-death-of-print-sf-author-religions-and-racism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/news/around-the-blogosphere-worldcon-reports-death-of-print-sf-author-religions-and-racism/</link>
	<description>From Modern Mythcraft to Magical Surrealism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:16:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/non-fiction/news/around-the-blogosphere-worldcon-reports-death-of-print-sf-author-religions-and-racism/comment-page-1/#comment-3601</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darkfantasy.org/fantasy/?p=844#comment-3601</guid>
		<description>Posting here about the Stephanie Meyer article because the Sassmonkey blog requires registration and I &lt;em&gt;hate&lt;/em&gt; it when blogs are set up like that --

I think Meyer&#039;s books are poorly written, and one aspect of that poor writing is that she&#039;s using a number of stereotypes in her characterization.  Some of this is probably unconscious on her part -- but a &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; writer questions his/her unconscious assumptions and tries to avoid lapsing into them (like any cliche).  So while no one can say whether Meyer herself is racist -- citing her religion as &quot;proof&quot; of this is kind of silly, and stereotyping in and of itself -- I think it&#039;s perfectly valid to point out the places in her fiction where she falls prey to the usual biased thinking that &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; raised in a racist society tends to do.  That&#039;s the kind of thinking that leads people to think Indians = close to nature = bestial = hey, the perfect werewolves!  Without even realizing that in the process they&#039;ve symbolically dehumanized a group of people.  

This kind of thinking certainly &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; be reinforced by religious teachings, especially if those teachings are racist (and I don&#039;t disagree that Mormonism contains some disturbingly &lt;em&gt;recent&lt;/em&gt; examples of doctrinal racism), but more often it&#039;s just reinforced by the subtle racism that permeates American society.

I &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; this is where Valdez-Rodriguez was trying to go, but she didn&#039;t articulate it very well.  =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posting here about the Stephanie Meyer article because the Sassmonkey blog requires registration and I <em>hate</em> it when blogs are set up like that &#8211;</p>
<p>I think Meyer&#8217;s books are poorly written, and one aspect of that poor writing is that she&#8217;s using a number of stereotypes in her characterization.  Some of this is probably unconscious on her part &#8212; but a <em>good</em> writer questions his/her unconscious assumptions and tries to avoid lapsing into them (like any cliche).  So while no one can say whether Meyer herself is racist &#8212; citing her religion as &#8220;proof&#8221; of this is kind of silly, and stereotyping in and of itself &#8212; I think it&#8217;s perfectly valid to point out the places in her fiction where she falls prey to the usual biased thinking that <em>anyone</em> raised in a racist society tends to do.  That&#8217;s the kind of thinking that leads people to think Indians = close to nature = bestial = hey, the perfect werewolves!  Without even realizing that in the process they&#8217;ve symbolically dehumanized a group of people.  </p>
<p>This kind of thinking certainly <em>can</em> be reinforced by religious teachings, especially if those teachings are racist (and I don&#8217;t disagree that Mormonism contains some disturbingly <em>recent</em> examples of doctrinal racism), but more often it&#8217;s just reinforced by the subtle racism that permeates American society.</p>
<p>I <em>think</em> this is where Valdez-Rodriguez was trying to go, but she didn&#8217;t articulate it very well.  =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

