Diversity in Speculative Fiction

Diversity in Speculative Fiction

articles, Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

permalink, jump to comments

It seems like a common trope that diversity and quality in speculative fiction are mutually exclusive. Or, at least not a double necessity. Whenever an internet discussion blows up over this issue (notably, the Eclipse 2 anthology and Helix Magazine debates just this past year), I see it frequently stated that quality is more important than diversity, to the point where you would think quality and diversity couldn’t live in the same story. And nobody ever questions this.

This feels like an intentional non sequitur. Quality isn’t something that you can judge universally; it’s highly subjective. One person’s gold is another person’s fool’s gold. But more to the point, quality as a criterion really has nothing to do with the health of the speculative fiction field. “Quality” may give us a little more prestige with the literary folks, but it doesn’t stretch the boundaries of what we consider “speculative fiction”. It doesn’t get us thinking new ideas, seeing new horizons. Diversity does.

Two fairly recent anthologies: Dark Matter: Reading the Bones (2005), edited by Sheree R. Thomas, and Cosmos Latinos: An Anthology of Science Fiction from Latin America and Spain (2003), edited by Andrea L. Bell and Yolanda Molina-Gavilán, showcase African-American and (mostly) Spanish-speaking spec-fic writers respectively. Both, as Silvia Moreno-Garcia remarked to me a few months ago, have stories that are far more likely to appear in literary publications than any spec-fic market. Now there’s an irony for you–quality according to literary terms is used as an excuse for not aggressively pursuing diversity in spec-fic, yet all the ethnically diverse spec-fic is in the Literary section of the bookstore.

This brings us to the central irony of downgrading the importance of diversity in speculative fiction. The term is “speculative fiction”. It’s not just about shiny, phallic rocket ships populated by deep-in-the-closet Aryan brethren conquering the Final Frontier, people. It’s about different futures, alternate realities, dangerous fantasies. You’d think such places, where dragons dwell, would be heavily populated with equally unusual people, but nope. Looks like everybody important there is white, male, anglophone and straight. Not to mention perfectly healthy physically and mentally.

Excuse me, but how is that “speculative”?

The two anthologies, in and of themselves, are deliberately non-diverse in that they are limited to specific subgenres. Every story in Dark Matter is written by African-American or Caribbean writers for an African-American audience. Every story in Cosmos Latinos is written by Spanish, Catalan or Basque speakers from Latin America and Spain.

But each anthology showcases a speculative tradition with visions not usually seen in mainstream specific because these traditions have been neglected by that mainstream.

Print This

Comments

5 Responses

Jump to comment box
  1. 1 • Constance said:
    November 19th, 2008 at 12:25 pm, permalink

    Two more books to add to my to read list!

  2. 2 • Juan said:
    November 19th, 2008 at 4:58 pm, permalink

    Thanks for tuning me in to Cosmos Latinos it is nice to know that the first two volumes of Dark Matter aren’t the only ones out there. Though I think you should’ve added So Long Been Dreaming into the mix, which features writers from post-colonial cultures. Unless you haven’t had the chance to review it yet. No harm, no foul either way though.

  3. 3 • Niall said:
    November 21st, 2008 at 4:15 am, permalink

    I see it frequently stated that quality is more important than diversity, to the point where you would think quality and diversity couldn’t live in the same story.

    Not to be picky, but I can’t see anyone in the two links you point to saying this. Who, exactly, where you thinking of?

    There are comments from editors saying that they read for the quality of the story independent of the diversity of its author, yes — but while there are good arguments against that, it’s a separate issue from the one you’re setting up here.

    I can’t see anyone in those discussions, nor can I remember anyone at the time, saying that they think the quality of a story is independent of the content of a story. Indeed, I would say the opposite is increasingly common — over the past few years I’ve seen plenty of praise for, say, Ian McDonald and Geoff Ryman because they have imagined non-Western futures.

  4. 4 • K. Tempest Bradford said:
    December 4th, 2008 at 9:22 am, permalink

    I don’t know for sure, but what I assumed she meant by that are the constant cries of “I just pick the best stories, I don’t care if the author is black, white, or purple!”

  5. 5 • Jill said:
    January 2nd, 2010 at 6:35 pm, permalink

    Think about adding S.R. Sarai’s “The Shun-Ur: Choosing Deceit”. Awesome book!

Leave a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>